+++ /dev/null
-// Idea here is to test the following property:\r
-// When a function is called recursively it has locally a monomorphic type.\r
-// Therefore the definition of cons does not work even if it works\r
-// with a proper type annotation.\r
-\r
-data Vec a = Nil | Zero (Vec (a,a)) | One a (Vec (a,a))\r
-\r
-// cons :: a -> Vec a -> Vec a\r
-cons x Nil = One x Nil\r
-cons x (Zero ps) = One x ps\r
-cons x (One y ps) = Zero (cons (x, y) ps)\r
---\r
-11:21-11:42: Expected <Vec (a, a)> got <Vec a>.\r
-11:33-11:34: Type (a, a) is not a subtype of a.\r
-11:36-11:37: Type (a, a) is not a subtype of a.\r
-11:39-11:41: Expected <Vec a> got <Vec (a, a)>.
\ No newline at end of file